Charting Obama’s journey to a shift on Afghanistan | Power & Policy

Charting Obama’s journey to a shift on Afghanistan

David E. Sanger

David E. Sanger

By David E. Sanger

Belfer Center Senior Fellow and Adjunct Lecturer, Harvard Kennedy School

(From the New York Times lead story, Sunday, May 20; adapted from David Sanger’s forthcoming book, “Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power.” )

It was just one brief exchange about Afghanistan with an aide late in 2009, but it suggests how President Obama’s thinking about what he once called “a war of necessity” began to radically change less than a year after he took up residency in the White House.

Not long before, after a highly contentious debate within a war cabinet that was riddled with leaks, Mr. Obama had reluctantly decided to order a surge of more than 30,000 troops. The aide told Mr. Obama that he believed military leaders had agreed to the tight schedule to begin withdrawing those troops just 18 months later only because they thought they could persuade an inexperienced president to grant more time if they demanded it.

“Well,” Mr. Obama responded that day, “I’m not going to give them more time.”

A year later, when the president and a half-dozen White House aides began to plan for the withdrawal, the generals were cut out entirely. There was no debate, and there were no leaks. And when Mr. Obama joins the leaders of other NATO nations in Chicago on Sunday and Monday, the full extent of how his thinking on Afghanistan has changed will be apparent. He will announce what he has already told the leaders in private: All combat operations led by American forces will cease in summer 2013, when the United States and other NATO forces move to a “support role” whether the Afghan military can secure the country or not.

Mr. Obama concluded in his first year that the Bush-era dream of remaking Afghanistan was a fantasy, and that the far greater threat to the United States was an unstable, nuclear-armed Pakistan. So he narrowed the goals in Afghanistan, and narrowed them again, until he could make the case that America had achieved limited objectives in a war that was, in any traditional sense, unwinnable.

Read the New York Times article

David E. Sanger is a senior fellow and adjunct lecturer in public policy at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. He is chief Washington correspondent for The New York Times.

Bookmark and Share

One Comment Post a comment

  1. Scott E Downer #

    Obama is going to be part of this List .
    Enron president committed conspiracy, making false statements, insider trading, and securities fraud
    Killed George Parkman in his Harvard lab in 1849
    Fugitive Czech financier facing federal bribery charges
    5. CHAS LEE
    Embezzled more than $100,000 from the Jimmy Fund
    Boston aristocrat and financier served time in Sing Sing for embezzlement
    Strangled his maid and lived out the rest of his days in McLean Hospital
    Pled guilty in 2002 to embezzling nearly $100,000 from Hasty Pudding Theatricals

    May 24, 2012

Leave a Reply

You may use basic HTML in your comments. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *